For a change, this year, I decided to set a goal of sorts for this race. The Go Hard or Go Home Half Marathon indicated that I am capable of running three loops of the park at a sub-7:00 pace, so I settled on aiming to finish under 1:10. Then I looked at the results from the past couple of years and realized that 1:09 would have been good enough to get me into the top ten females. I don’t like using placement as an ultimate goal, since there’s so much about it that’s out of your control, but 1:09 is better than 1:10 anyway, so I decided to try for that.
And then my PT told me to run 1:08. He may have been joking. As I was when I said that if I was already going to run 1:08, I may as well just run ten seconds faster to beat my PR. I was joking because I do not feel like I am in any way in PR shape, to the extent that I did a (short) speed workout on Friday since I was sure the race was a lost cause.
Especially since it was supposed to be cold. Granted, not as cold as it can be, and has been, for this race in the past… but I really don’t do well in the cold, as I’ve said ad nauseam. I debated over whether to wear shorts, but in the end I just felt so beaten down by the misery of winter that I went with tights instead.
At some point, once I’d defrosted a bit, I felt like I could have been okay in shorts; but I never felt too hot in the tights, so I suppose it was the right choice.
Especially since this is how I started out — the same way I seem to start out all races these days, wrapped up in a heat sheet. I wore that for a little over a mile, then carried it for a few minutes until passing a trash can in which I was able to dispose of it.
That was after the first time up the hill. Which I took super easy, because A. I was still too damn cold not to, and B. I know that I am not a strong hill runner, so that’s a dumb place to expend all my energy. Of course, the smarter thing to do would be to work on it so that I get stronger on hills, especially since, you know, Jerusalem. And Boston. But oh well. The advantage to running a course with which you are familiar is that it makes it easier to adjust your pacing tactically in ways that suit your strengths and weaknesses.
The mile markers were super confusing; I passed the first one before my watch hit the first mile, and then by the fifth one, my watch was over 5.1. I wasn’t sure what that meant in terms of a PR, but since the Bronx did measure super long, I was just keeping an eye on my average pace with the knowledge that I needed to keep it below what it was in the Bronx. Problem was that I didn’t exactly remember that pace. Oops.
I wasn’t sure how many women were ahead of me, but I was pretty certain it was more than ten. Picking them off gave me something to do, but by the halfway point, I had almost run out of them — except for Karen, and we ended up finishing at the same time. This isn’t because I was so super duper speedy, but because they were so far ahead of me that I had no hope of catching them.
We crossed over the mats at the end of every loop, and the clock read 23:03 when I came through the first time, so I knew I needed to see at most 46:06 and 1:09:09 if I didn’t want a positive split. Works for me, since I was aiming for 1:09 after all, yes??
Well. It seems that I am nothing if not obedient, because with a couple of miles to go, I realized that if I didn’t ease up to “just finish in 1:09,” I actually stood a chance of making my PT prophetic and running 1:08. I had checked the difference in elapsed time on my watch and the course clock when I passed it in the first loop, so I knew what it needed to say if I was to PR… and as I approached the finish line, it was ticking perilously close to that. Cue the sprint like a crazy person finish.
It seemed to have been enough, since the elapsed time on my watch — which is generally a couple of seconds over my chip time — matched my previous PR. Phew.
Garmin recorded 10.07 miles in 1:07:52, 6:44/mi.
And just because the splits look a little erratic, I am choosing to take comfort in the Strava GAP. Even though that probably doesn’t mean very much, since somehow there’s variation in it when I run on a track.
But Strava also shows this, which is lovely! (Granted, it’s the first time I really tried to race this. But still.)
As for my “top ten” goal… ha, ha, ha, yeah, no. Of course I’d always prefer a PR over an impressive-sounding placement, so at least I did manage that.
Officially, 10 miles in 1:07:49.8, 6:47/mi. 74/647 OA, 15/304 F, and 6/102 F30-39. It’s technically a PR by 1.2 seconds, but I am choosing not to round up, thank you very much, and will consider it two seconds.
That’s also a faster pace than I ran on this same course in my 5-mile PR, and just a couple of seconds slower than my pace at the 10K PR I ran on a super flat course. I am such an Endurance Monster, it is not even funny.
I don’t really need to play the McMillan prediction game, since the times will be virtually identical to the ones from my previous 10-mile PR! But I did it anyway so that I could compare them with Daniels’ predictions, and I really do think the latter is more suited to my actual abilities, since I’ve gotten close to that marathon time but haven’t beaten it yet; and the shorter distances are just a couple of seconds off my PRs. I think I’ll still with McMillan anyway, though, if only because there is a wider variety of distances from which to choose!
Even though the shorter distances are so ridiculously hilarious, I’d cry if I weren’t laughing.